|
ClippersGM
Guest
|
 |
« on: August 05, 2010, 06:54:24 PM » |
|
Welcome aboard, from the FBB forums
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Todd
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2010, 07:02:22 PM » |
|
Welcome new guy. Good luck!!
How's your sense of humor? The last PistonsGM was one funny MOFO.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 2021, 2022 and 2029 RBSL Champions Bottlers Only Retired Number: 13 Carolanne Boutilier |
|
|
|
Dan
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2010, 07:09:58 PM » |
|
Welcome aboard. Glad to see the teams filling up again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aamir
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2010, 07:16:50 PM » |
|
Welcome aboard dude!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
exThunderGM
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2010, 07:28:43 PM » |
|
Welcome aboard. Glad to see the teams filling up again.
What this guys said. Welcome. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "Dan is the Bieber loving fruitcake.. " SpursGM |
|
|
|
Darren
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2010, 07:55:27 PM » |
|
Welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
76ers: 2018, 2033, 2035 Kings: 2039 |
|
|
|
AsstRapsGM
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2010, 03:46:49 PM » |
|
pretty sure this guy aint happenin..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 2030, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2053, 2063, 2064 |
|
|
|
SpiritGM
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2010, 11:52:23 AM » |
|
Welcome dude. I have a bit of bad news for you.. Before the old Pistons GM left, he traded his 2035 first round pick to me in a Terrance Grant transaction but we were not able to post it since he's traded his 2034 pick away (to Spurs  ) FYI I'll be posting this once the 2035 season has started. Just a heads up for you so it doesn't become a shock then. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AsstRapsGM
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2010, 12:25:06 PM » |
|
Welcome dude. I have a bit of bad news for you.. Before the old Pistons GM left, he traded his 2035 first round pick to me in a Terrance Grant transaction but we were not able to post it since he's traded his 2034 pick away (to Spurs ) FYI I'll be posting this once the 2035 season has started. Just a heads up for you so it doesn't become a shock then. This is gonna get really interesting.. Especially since im sure its still a CPU controlled team.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2030, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2053, 2063, 2064 |
|
|
|
SpiritGM
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2010, 12:58:22 PM » |
|
Hah! So rape and pillage time!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aamir
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2010, 04:48:13 PM » |
|
Hah! So rape and pillage time!! Hide your children and women everyone. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
OldNuggetsGM
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2010, 05:49:54 AM » |
|
Welcome dude. I have a bit of bad news for you.. Before the old Pistons GM left, he traded his 2035 first round pick to me in a Terrance Grant transaction but we were not able to post it since he's traded his 2034 pick away (to Spurs ) FYI I'll be posting this once the 2035 season has started. Just a heads up for you so it doesn't become a shock then. This is gonna get really interesting.. Especially since im sure its still a CPU controlled team.. well even if it isn't. why should he do this. this was a trade between the oldgm and the mavs. i can't see any argument why this trade still should be done. it is a risk for every gm to make such a trade and i really think we should forbid such deals. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scott
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2010, 07:56:02 AM » |
|
well even if it isn't. why should he do this. this was a trade between the oldgm and the mavs. i can't see any argument why this trade still should be done. it is a risk for every gm to make such a trade and i really think we should forbid such deals.
100% disagree. Since we can't trade two 1st rounders in a row it's entirely possible that you'd need to trade a 1st not shown on your current roster page; if you have your '34 1st, but don't have your '35 1st... the only 1st round pick you can trade is your '37, a pick that isn't on your current roster page. Forbidding this would greatly reduce the opportunity for deals to be made, in a league where trades are already tough to come by sometimes. And as for the trade not getting done; yes the deal was made by a previous GM but the deal benefited both franchises, and both franchises are responsible to uphold their part of the deal. Even if there's a new GM in town. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2010, 09:03:38 AM » |
|
well even if it isn't. why should he do this. this was a trade between the oldgm and the mavs. i can't see any argument why this trade still should be done. it is a risk for every gm to make such a trade and i really think we should forbid such deals.
100% disagree. Since we can't trade two 1st rounders in a row it's entirely possible that you'd need to trade a 1st not shown on your current roster page; if you have your '34 1st, but don't have your '35 1st... the only 1st round pick you can trade is your '37, a pick that isn't on your current roster page. Forbidding this would greatly reduce the opportunity for deals to be made, in a league where trades are already tough to come by sometimes. And as for the trade not getting done; yes the deal was made by a previous GM but the deal benefited both franchises, and both franchises are responsible to uphold their part of the deal. Even if there's a new GM in town. /agree 100% |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
OldNuggetsGM
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2010, 10:09:28 AM » |
|
well so if i trade my 040 pick to make a deal possible is this still an option? Sorry but being a gm means operatiing with what is available at the moment not in the future. that is like telling a guy i will give you 2000 cash i will earn in the future. i mean how many future considerations can you make before your team can't fullfill their duties anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
