HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2018, 12:20:03 PM » |
|
Regarding coaching attributes changes. I believe we should set the rule that you can only increase your lowest attribute and decrease your highest attribute. Otherwise GM could simply decide to decrease scouting attribute to F, rely on html scouting and leave other training camp attributes unaffected.
For instance, the team that got -2 this season must split -1 over two attributes and in case he get -1 next season it must be assigned to third attribute that.
I think this is a smart idea and a good catch of a loophole that might not have been obvious until it was being exploited. We can see already that virtually every team forced to lose points has so far elected to have them taken from the scouting section. Another less elegant option would be to simply eliminate the ability to increase/decrease the scouting attributes, but I think Gasper's suggestion is better and sort of simulates an overall organizational decay/improvement which I find more realistic than a team cratering or excelling in a single area. In real life a winning or losing culture snowballs and permeates an entire organization. I agree with both Kile and Gasper. As a tanking team who decreased my scouting, I probably wouldve taken advantage if this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Hawks since 2079.
|
|
|
MagicGM
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2018, 02:08:41 PM » |
|
Reminder that beginning this season, the anti-tanking rules are in place and rookie contract extensions set the 5th year at 2x the previous year's salary.
Regarding coaching attributes changes. I believe we should set the rule that you can only increase your lowest attribute and decrease your highest attribute. Otherwise GM could simply decide to decrease scouting attribute to F, rely on html scouting and leave other training camp attributes unaffected. For instance, the team that got -2 this season must split -1 over two attributes and in case he get -1 next season it must be assigned to third attribute that. Yes, this is the way it works.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KingsGM
Moderators
Hero Member
Posts: 1614
Of COURSE Game 6 was Fixed
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2018, 04:24:04 PM » |
|
Yes, this is the way it works.
I did not know that this had been decided. This thread should probably say something about that, as there are teams already selecting -2 scouting.
|
|
|
Logged
|
2079-80 and 2093-94 GM's Choice GM of the Year
|
|
|
MagicGM
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2018, 04:39:02 PM » |
|
Yes, this is the way it works.
I did not know that this had been decided. This thread should probably say something about that, as there are teams already selecting -2 scouting. There are only 3 ratings. A B and C. You simply cannot go -2 from B in any role in any event.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PelicansGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2018, 10:21:43 PM » |
|
Pretty sure it was said B to B- then C+ and so on.
I remember it was discussed on whatsapp when i asked by what point? 75 to 74 or something like that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PelicansGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2018, 10:27:19 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MagicGM
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2018, 01:23:33 AM » |
|
Read the initial post. It has been crystal clear the whole time.
There will be 3 possible values for each coaching stat: B (the standard/starting value), A (the "improved" value), and C (the "weak" value)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PelicansGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2018, 03:50:28 AM » |
|
Read the initial post. It has been crystal clear the whole time.
There will be 3 possible values for each coaching stat: B (the standard/starting value), A (the "improved" value), and C (the "weak" value)
k. Done.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CavsGM
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 14, 2018, 08:31:00 AM » |
|
Didnt we decide 1 point for 1 through 4 aswell
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cavs since 2038 2043 Champions Blake Ward MVP 2057 Champions Kurt Moss MVP
|
|
|
MagicGM
|
|
« Reply #39 on: March 14, 2018, 08:57:07 AM » |
|
Didnt we decide 1 point for 1 through 4 aswell
Nope, we got rid of that because of fear it would be too strong for superteams.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CavsGM
|
|
« Reply #40 on: March 15, 2018, 11:02:55 AM » |
|
Didnt we decide 1 point for 1 through 4 aswell
Nope, we got rid of that because of fear it would be too strong for superteams. wat I was saying is there is only 1 point up advantage no matter how good u r
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cavs since 2038 2043 Champions Blake Ward MVP 2057 Champions Kurt Moss MVP
|
|
|
WizardsGM
|
|
« Reply #41 on: March 15, 2018, 06:48:10 PM » |
|
Didnt we decide 1 point for 1 through 4 aswell
Nope, we got rid of that because of fear it would be too strong for superteams. wat I was saying is there is only 1 point up advantage no matter how good u r Yes. This promotes being good over an extended period of time, rather than having a superteam for 3 years and leaving with a +6.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Washington Wizards GM: 2056-Present Career Record: 1816-1218 (59.9%) Playoff Record: 192-131 (59.4%) ECF Champs: 2061, 2070, 2071, 2086, 2087, 2088, 2091
|
|
|
KingsGM
Moderators
Hero Member
Posts: 1614
Of COURSE Game 6 was Fixed
|
|
« Reply #42 on: April 18, 2018, 01:05:13 PM » |
|
Rule is in place starting this season. 60 wins only gets +1 rating for the reason Celtics identified.
Great stats!
?
|
|
|
Logged
|
2079-80 and 2093-94 GM's Choice GM of the Year
|
|
|
MagicGM
|
|
« Reply #43 on: June 11, 2018, 10:35:00 PM » |
|
Want to discuss whether, beginning next season you can't extend one year contracts with TBD. Was discussed earlier in this thread but it never made it into the rulebook.
Discuss. I am fine with the change but don't think it's a big deal either way.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CelticsGMOld
|
|
« Reply #44 on: June 11, 2018, 10:37:53 PM » |
|
The main argument in favor of the rule is when good but overpaid players get cut and signed mid season. These guys would obviously not accept a small extension. The general principle applies to everyone who signs mid season, because we auto sign them for 1 year vet min, which they normally might not accept.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|